Respect toward nature, Peter Wohlleben books and what does it mean to be human

Today I am going to write about Peter Wohlleben books.
I have read both The Hidden Life of Trees
as The Inner Life of Animals.

Lately popular books written by German forester.
Somehow I do not know how to classify them.
They can be classified as popular science books
but sometimes they become more like a kind of 
the author's diary where
he shares his stories about trees and animals.
I can admit that I enjoyed reading it.
Especially that I am a complete biology laic
so I found a lot of new pieces of information
served in easy to understand form.
Yes, I learnt a lot and did not get bored.
I even found myself checking trees and birds on the Internet
to be able to distinguish them.
During a walk in a park I was looking on trees 
checking different things that I read in the books.

So good job Herr Wohlleben!

But... yes there is a big "but" here.

But firstly I would like to highlight a thing
that I 100% agree with the author
and I am thankful for him to write about it
and share it with such a wide public:

Respect toward nature.
Independently is it pig, dog, beech or bee.
All they need respect the same as human needs.
World belongs not only for us humans.
Animals do not exist to fulfill any human desires or needs.
Every living creature belongs to this world and has a rule
to realise its nature.
Trees are as alive as any other beings.
They only do everything slower. Much, more slower. 
Impossible for us to perceive. And also they use different methods.

(Cracow, botanical garden)

(My bf photographing owl)


Wait- somebody would like to say.
You compare beech to dog?
Yes. Because the fact of being alive is the same.
Cognitive functions or whatever else are completely different categories.

Simply fact of being alive requires respect.
I would like to add that our cognitive functions not only
don't give us any special privileges but also
they oblige us to give this respect to nature.
Wild animal will behave according to their instinct 
but we have a tool to reconsider it and improve our behaviour.

One Wohlleben's story that left a disgust in me
was about a rabbit who behave really badly toward other
rabbits that the author was keeping.
When he finally realised who stays behind
all the problems that were occurring
he just ....killed and ate the bad rabbit...

Sorry, but I do not see any respect here.
I only see the most ugly species chauvinism I could imagine.
I can not accept this kind of selective morality.

The second thing is that Wohlleben daydreams 
in a book which tries to look like a popular science one.

Trees having social instincts?
Helping each other, taking care of children?
Socialising?
He almost sees brain in tree roots!


(Polish cover of Hidden life of trees
looks almost like some kind of magical book.
Some kind of initiation.....
to truth? Rather to a beautiful fantasy)


You know pretty well about chemicals and senstive cels of trees Herr Wohlleben.
So write a popular science.
If you want you can make your new book a tree fairytale
but do not mix two genres in one book...

We are all equal when it comes to being alive
but we are different on other levels
so do not create an utopia.

It can be quite useful though.
When they are equal it does not change anything
if we eat pig or lettuce.
They are all alive.
Let's give them respect and bon appetite!

Here it is important to realise 
that except being alive there are other levels to compare.
Like feeling of pain.
Yes, sensory neutrons are one of them.

Plus what I said earlier.
Our cognitive functions bring many obligations.
One of them is respect toward all living beings.

Recpect scale is marked by our possibilities.
I will do as much as possible.
Vege terrorism does not make any sense.
We are also part of this world 
and have a law to use it.
But we want to call ourselves humans,
we do not need animals suffering to continue our lives.
So let's make use of our cognitive functions
and choose well. Choose respect.
Respect to animals, plants, the Earth.

(Hakone, Japan)


Comments

  1. I've seen those books and was pretty curious about them. The covers are absolutely beautiful. I'm most interested in the one about animals, but plan to give Hidden life of trees to my Grandma, as she became very interested in nature ever since she became a close friend of a certain gentleman forrester.

    While I'm sadly not a vegan or even vegetarian due to various issues, I would love to in the future. It pains me greatly how we treat animals as our property. I wish we did not have to harm them whatsoever.

    The part about rabbit really disturbed me. I'm really careful with animal books, because very often writers that claim to love them suddenly do a 180 and describe harming them. The rabbit deserved help, not being murdered! This is such a human thinking: if an animal is a problem, just kill it. After all, it's just an animal, so it's okay to do with it whatever you want.
    I can't imagine harming any animal, not to mention one I was taking care of. I used to have three bunnies. One was abused by a previous owner and in the beginning, it was constantly scratching and biting us. With time, care and given back freedom (it used to live in a tiny cage) it became a very happy and loving (if slightly nervous) bunny.

    I honestly believe that harming a helpless creature that trusts you is the worst kind of betrayal.

    Side note - I really like how you are able to see flaws of books that you enjoyed. I know that it seems quite basic skill, but I've noticed (mostly in the Polish side of internet) that many people lack it. They either love or hate things and are unable to look at them in more analytical mode, noticing both the good and bad. I would either scratch my head or laugh when reading the more new age parts of the book!

    Despite the small cons of the books, I think they will make a lovely addition to my Grandma's library. So thank you for your thoughts on them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts